『壹』 跪求法律英語翻譯。。。急急急急！！！！
1.A valid contract usually includes the following four elements: (1) the contract both sides agree (2) the price (3) contracts required agreement (4) each party hereto with legal qualifications.
2.The jury system refers to a group of vowed of people gathered to debate the fact that the referee, make justice in the jury to perform the ties of the members which is juror.
3.The United States constitution stipulates the congress is the main lawmakers, but congress of law must obey the President's veto. Administrative agencies responsible for foreign affairs, but the treaty concluded with foreign governments need to pass the senate approval.
4.Tort law aims to compensate the person or property by others illegal act of infringing upon man, damage compensation is usually money compensation.
5.In our country main punishment have the following kinds: (1) control (2) criminal detention (3) fixed-term imprisonment, (4) life imprisonment (5) the death penalty
6.In the United States, the court has the authority to examine congress, the state, and the laws of the region, aimed to determine whether these laws consistent with the constitution.
7.A country's property law reflects his personal and collective right basic attitude, the American constitution recognition and protection of private property.
8.Citizens from birth till death, has civil rights, shall enjoy civil rights and assume civil obligations.
1.受人權法案保障的權利不是絕對的。在合同章程中闡述的原則是得到政府的形式和內容。歸根結底，這是美國最高法院的合同章程，即賦予意義解釋，並確定邊界，由合同章程的權益保障每當受到抑製成為誹謗性言論。
2.對過失侵權的侵權行為是最廣泛，是最人身傷害案件的基礎。它的四個經典內容如下：（1）被告欠了應有的謹慎責任（也就是說，他的行事作為的情況下，合理謹慎的人）向原告（2）被告違反該義務;（3）被告的違約是原告受傷的法律和近因;（4）原告蒙受作為被告的行為而遭受損失。
3.違反合同的法律概念是一個有約束力的協議是由一個或多個得不到尊重當事人多次未履行合同或受到干擾,另一方的性能。
4.一個輕微違規、部分違約或無形違約一方，破壞方發生的無權定單的義務的履行,但只有收集實際耗用的損害。（這句完全不知在說什麼）
*****本人幾近法盲，以上內容，請再自行修改。******
『貳』 法律英語翻譯。急！
American tort law of strict liability from the United Kingdom, has now become the mainland legal scholars often use the concept. European countries have been integrated into the principles of tort law system of Liability. In recent years, the scope of strict liability for the widening trend. Strict liability is based on the absolute obligation of security breach, although when it is done to the most careful of people's attention, but any damage caused by their actions and take responsibility. Defense against strict liability is very limited, reasonable care not among them. Strict liability for abnormally dangerous most frequent activity or proct liability cases.
The essential characteristics of strict liability
(A) the fault of the non-strict liability
Strict liability is undoubtedly the responsibility of following the fault which occurred after a new milestone. It is the advent of the fault is to determine the factors responsible is no longer the ultimate basis for liability, which is concive to protecting the innocent victims and vulnerable groups.
(B) the risk of strict liability
Looking at national tort law, strict liability and risk are inevitably linked. German civil law countries, said strict liability for hazardous ty. Some scholars would risk liability and strict liability common law equivalent. Similarly in France the use of a dangerous activity as the basis of strict liability. [20] but in fact Anglo-American tort law, strict liability apply to animals in addition to causing the infringement, workers compensation, proct liability, the most unusual is for harm caused by hazardous activities.
(C) Strict Liability of
Offenders in their fault liability for damage arising in, the reason is because the liability of the perpetrator can be a moral disapproval of. However, the perpetrator of strict liability without fault, will still be liable, the attribution of the basis for intriguing. The western half of the 20th century's most influential jurists of Pond from the maintenance of social security obligations generally off, demonstrates the rationality of strict liability. He believes that since the late 19th century, the legal interests of the community rather than focus on the protection of personal interests.
(D) strict liability causality
Responsibility for the fault is the fault element of the final decision is to determine whether the establishment of the key fault liability. In the composition of the elements of strict liability, regardless of whether the offender's fault. Therefore, the causal relationship has more significance, it is the ultimate constituent elements of strict liability element. Strict liability in the causation and damage are only two elements, namely, proof of causation by the plaintiff as long as the damage to these two factors and can get relief.
(E) of strict liability Juzheng
Strict liability is based on the absolute security breach of its obligations, regardless of whether the defendant to do the ty of care to the most cautious, as long as it should be responsible for the damage occurred, if the defendant can not be reasonable to defense (and defense is very limited), you can not remove responsibility, that is part of the plaintiff's burden of proof shifted to the defendant, the plaintiff only to prove causation and damage had been sufficient.
(F) defense of strict liability in the Restrictive
1, the third behavior, animal behavior and the forces of nature cause damage can not be the defenses.
2, the victim can not be the fault of defense.
3, the victims of people, things and animals, abnormal sensitivity can be used as defense.
4, the performance of public ties as defense.
Comment on the strict liability
(A) availability: American tort law is rooted in the philosophy of pragmatism in the soil, advocating people-centered, knowledge and human experience claims can not be separated, emphasizing the unity of theory and practice. On this basis, the case law system is the empirical wisdom of judges and logical reasoning with the proct. The strict liability from the case law through evolution, widening the scope of its application, this fact itself proves the rule dynamic and practical.
(B) Transcendence: whether scholars have the responsibility of strict liability is equivalent to what different opinions, but no doubt that it goes beyond the French law "presumption of fault liability" and the German law, "dangerous ty," and broke through to abstract known for speculative and logically coherent system of civil law tort theory of barriers to a unified system to a al responsibility principle or the principle of diversity attributable to system development, and thus the world had a profound influence legislation.
(C) justice: perpetrators and victims of strict liability emphasized to achieve a balance of interests, reflecting the protection of the weak instead of the new concept of equal protection, and to achieve substantial justice. This is in the field of proct liability and workers compensation in particular stands out.
要懸賞分呀！
『叄』 法律專業術語英文翻譯
網路隱私權 Online Privacy Rights
網路實名制 real name registration
侵權主體main part of Infringement
侵權責任 Infringement Responsibility或 the Responsibility of Infringement
侵犯 infringe
人肉搜索 Internet mass hunting或Cyber Manhunt
歷史分析法 historic analysis或history analysis
比較分析法method of comparative analysis
法解釋學方法method of Law Hermeneutic
呵呵，費了很多功夫幫你查的，希望能幫到你~~
『肆』 請問一個法律術語的英語翻譯。
直接翻譯成Attribution Principle就可以了。
『伍』 救助英語高手解答法律英語翻譯題。 行為人因過錯侵害他人民事權益或利益的，應當承擔侵權責任。
Acts who through their fault infringe upon the civil rights or interests, he shall assume the tort liability.
『陸』 急求法律英語的一段翻譯，不要翻譯工具的，非常非常感謝
第三部分從前兩部分內容中提煉出本案的爭議焦點，並在第四部分圍繞其摘開討論：視頻網站版權侵權損害賠償責任認定；「通知與移除」免責條款的適用；損害賠償數額的認定方式。其中，第一個問題在理論界主流觀點一直存在分歧，過錯說及無過錯說均不乏支持者。後兩個問題則是對近年法院針對視頻網站版權侵權審判方式加以探討。「通知與移除」免責條款是借鑒美國法律的結果，而在對通知的作用與意義、作為被告的視頻網站主觀心態的認定的理解上卻存在誤區，以致各地法院在適用條件上標准不一。至於賠償數額的計算方法，由於此類案件的復雜性和特殊性，法院在審判中常用的和創造性採用的方法均值得研究。
第五部分是研究結論，通過對上述三個爭議焦點的分析論證，筆者提出了自己的觀點，對於視頻網站版權侵權問題，首先必須適用過錯責任原則解決損害賠償責任。其次，對於「通知與移除」免責條款這一舶來品，要結合法律本義及具體案情在認定網站主觀過錯的基礎上決定是否適用，尤其要釐清通知的性質。而鑒於視頻網站版權侵權屢禁不止，賠償數額採用補償式的計算方式已無法獨立解決這一問題。最後，筆者針對上述問題對立法及審判方式提出了自己的一些建議。
Before the third part of contents of the two parts to extract the focus of controversy in this case and in the fourth part of open discussion around its pick: Video website right infringement liability for damage found; "notice and remove the" exemption clauses apply; amount of damages identification methods. One of the first questions at the theoretical circles have been the mainstream opinion differences, fault and no-fault Say Say there is no lack of supporters of both. After two questions, it is the courts in recent years web for video right infringement trial mode to be explored. "Notice and remove the" exemption clause in the United States are drawing on the results of the law, while in the notification of the role and significance, as the defendant's subjective video web mentality on the understanding that there are errors all over the court at which the conditions on the application of standards 1. As for the method of calculating the amount of compensation, such cases because of the complexity and particularity, the court at trial and creative use of commonly used methods are worth studying.
The fifth part is the conclusion of the study, through focus on the above analysis of three controversial argument, the author put forward their opinion, the web video right infringement problem, we must first resolve the application of the principle of fault liability damages. Secondly, for "notice and remove the" exemption clause in the imports, in conjunction with the legal merits of the original meaning and the specific website at that subjective fault on the basis of deciding whether to apply, in particular, want to clarify the nature of the notice. In view of the video website of repeated right infringement, the amount of compensation using the method for calculating the compensation has been unable to independently solve this problem. Finally, the author of legislation to address these issues and the trial by way of some of the recommendations of its own.
權能:Empowerment
『柒』 誰懂法律英語
涉及條款12.3和12.4，對於以許可期間首日後接連的一個月內提出的所有請求，許可證發放者在協定下或與協定相關的對許可證持有者的全部責任（如果存在的話），不論是合同、侵權（包括過失）或其他情形，都應以許可證持有者在那一個月期間內以許可費的方式交給許可證發放者的數額為限。
這應該是比較正式的翻譯。
『捌』 法律英語高手請進
侵權責任liability for tort
契約責任contractual liability
民法civil law
合同關系congruence relation
第三方責任 The third party liability
委託人 client /consigner /constituent
『玖』 有幾個法律英語句子請幫忙翻譯一下
1. To establish an effective contract, the parties must be consensual, and the agreement is adopted by the party to put forward an offer that the other party to accept an offer to be embodied in
2. If the commitment to the force of law to become an exchange, it is necessary to carry out
3. Must have a valid contract for the parties to support the price.'s Definition of price is reached through bargaining and exchange. In other words, those who accept the commitment to give up something or suffer damage to the contract in exchange for promises
4. Revocable contracts can mean the cancellation of the contract, that is to say, even if the contract by the agreement constitutes a clear and there is value and purpose of the law, a party can legally withdraw
5. Contract can be considered as null and void a number of reasons, such as illegal, not price, or one or both parties do not ability. In some cases, out of public order and good customs of the reasons, the court will determine a legal contract null and void
6. Intentional tort some of the accused can show that the infringement is allowed to raise legal defense
7. Fraud as a violation of a defense
8. Tort law is what the violations, and that can be socially acceptable and responsible standards of conct
9. Contract is an agreement of both parties, a party that is in violation of the agreement constitute a breach of contract
10. Waiver of indivial freedom does not constitute unlawful detention
『拾』 什麼是侵權 侵權責任
一、侵權行為是一種侵害他人權益的行為，因此侵權行為也可以稱為一種侵害行為，這可以從詞源學上得到一定程度的印證。在英語中，「侵權行為」一詞稱作「tort"，來源於拉丁文「tortus "，原意是指扭曲和彎曲，它也用於將某人的手臂或腿砍掉的情形，此種含義仍然能從德語（jemanden einen Tort antum；Tortur）和法語(avior tort;faire tortous)中找到，以後該詞逐漸演化為錯誤(Wrong)的意思。在法語中，tortum和tort都是來源於拉丁語「delictum"，其原意是「過錯」，「罪過」。拉丁語名詞delictum派生於動詞delinqere（偏離正確的道路），意思是一個違法、一個失誤或者一個錯誤。中文的「侵權行為」一詞「最早於清末編定《大清民律》草案時才開始應用。」但是在舊中國民法中對侵權行為的概念卻缺乏明確的界定。
二、
行為分類
（1）按構成要件分
一般侵權行為：指行為人基於過錯直接致人損害，因而適用民法上一般責任條款的行為。
特殊侵權行為：行為人雖無過錯 但依民法特別責任條款或民事特別法應承擔責任的行為 。
（2）按侵害對象分
侵害財產權行為：包括侵害物權及知識產權中的財產權行為。
侵害人身權行為：包括侵害他人身體和心理的行為。
（3）按致害人的人數分
單獨侵權行為：致害人僅為一人的侵權行為。
共同侵權行為：致害人為二人以上的侵權行為 致害人應負連帶的損害賠償責任。
（4）按行為性質分
積極侵權行為：指致害人以積極作為的形式致人損害的行為。
消極侵權行為：指致害人以消極不作為的形式致人損害的行為。
三、
侵權責任是指民事主體因實施侵權行為而應承擔的民事法律後果。侵權責任是任何人都對他人承擔這樣一種義務，即不因為自己的錯誤（過錯）行為而侵害了他人的合法權益，否則即能構成侵權行為，要對受害方承擔責任。侵權行為基本上都是違法行為。
法律特徵
侵權責任的法律特徵表現在：
1、侵權責任是民事主體因違反法律規定的義務而應承擔的法律後果
規定
民事義務有法定義務和約定義務，法定義務是通過法律的強制性規范、禁止性規范設定的義務。這種義務對於每個自然人、法人具有普遍的適用性，違反此種義務，即構成侵權行為責任。而約定義務則是特定當事人之間設定的某種義務，違反約定義務，構成違約責任。
2、侵權責任以侵權行為為前提要件
侵權責任產生的基礎是侵權行為，沒有侵權行為則不存在承擔侵權責任的問題。侵權責任正是行為人實施侵權行為應承擔的法律後果。
3、侵權責任的形式具有多樣性
侵權責任的行為人或責任人除了要承擔賠償損失、返還財產等財產責任外，在很多情況下，還可能同時承擔停止侵害、恢復名譽、消除影響、賠禮道歉等非財產形式的責任。