『壹』 跪求法律英语翻译。。。急急急急！！！！
1.A valid contract usually includes the following four elements: (1) the contract both sides agree (2) the price (3) contracts required agreement (4) each party hereto with legal qualifications.
2.The jury system refers to a group of vowed of people gathered to debate the fact that the referee, make justice in the jury to perform the ties of the members which is juror.
3.The United States constitution stipulates the congress is the main lawmakers, but congress of law must obey the President's veto. Administrative agencies responsible for foreign affairs, but the treaty concluded with foreign governments need to pass the senate approval.
4.Tort law aims to compensate the person or property by others illegal act of infringing upon man, damage compensation is usually money compensation.
5.In our country main punishment have the following kinds: (1) control (2) criminal detention (3) fixed-term imprisonment, (4) life imprisonment (5) the death penalty
6.In the United States, the court has the authority to examine congress, the state, and the laws of the region, aimed to determine whether these laws consistent with the constitution.
7.A country's property law reflects his personal and collective right basic attitude, the American constitution recognition and protection of private property.
8.Citizens from birth till death, has civil rights, shall enjoy civil rights and assume civil obligations.
1.受人权法案保障的权利不是绝对的。在合同章程中阐述的原则是得到政府的形式和内容。归根结底，这是美国最高法院的合同章程，即赋予意义解释，并确定边界，由合同章程的权益保障每当受到抑制成为诽谤性言论。
2.对过失侵权的侵权行为是最广泛，是最人身伤害案件的基础。它的四个经典内容如下：（1）被告欠了应有的谨慎责任（也就是说，他的行事作为的情况下，合理谨慎的人）向原告（2）被告违反该义务;（3）被告的违约是原告受伤的法律和近因;（4）原告蒙受作为被告的行为而遭受损失。
3.违反合同的法律概念是一个有约束力的协议是由一个或多个得不到尊重当事人多次未履行合同或受到干扰,另一方的性能。
4.一个轻微违规、部分违约或无形违约一方，破坏方发生的无权定单的义务的履行,但只有收集实际耗用的损害。（这句完全不知在说什么）
*****本人几近法盲，以上内容，请再自行修改。******
『贰』 法律英语翻译。急！
American tort law of strict liability from the United Kingdom, has now become the mainland legal scholars often use the concept. European countries have been integrated into the principles of tort law system of Liability. In recent years, the scope of strict liability for the widening trend. Strict liability is based on the absolute obligation of security breach, although when it is done to the most careful of people's attention, but any damage caused by their actions and take responsibility. Defense against strict liability is very limited, reasonable care not among them. Strict liability for abnormally dangerous most frequent activity or proct liability cases.
The essential characteristics of strict liability
(A) the fault of the non-strict liability
Strict liability is undoubtedly the responsibility of following the fault which occurred after a new milestone. It is the advent of the fault is to determine the factors responsible is no longer the ultimate basis for liability, which is concive to protecting the innocent victims and vulnerable groups.
(B) the risk of strict liability
Looking at national tort law, strict liability and risk are inevitably linked. German civil law countries, said strict liability for hazardous ty. Some scholars would risk liability and strict liability common law equivalent. Similarly in France the use of a dangerous activity as the basis of strict liability. [20] but in fact Anglo-American tort law, strict liability apply to animals in addition to causing the infringement, workers compensation, proct liability, the most unusual is for harm caused by hazardous activities.
(C) Strict Liability of
Offenders in their fault liability for damage arising in, the reason is because the liability of the perpetrator can be a moral disapproval of. However, the perpetrator of strict liability without fault, will still be liable, the attribution of the basis for intriguing. The western half of the 20th century's most influential jurists of Pond from the maintenance of social security obligations generally off, demonstrates the rationality of strict liability. He believes that since the late 19th century, the legal interests of the community rather than focus on the protection of personal interests.
(D) strict liability causality
Responsibility for the fault is the fault element of the final decision is to determine whether the establishment of the key fault liability. In the composition of the elements of strict liability, regardless of whether the offender's fault. Therefore, the causal relationship has more significance, it is the ultimate constituent elements of strict liability element. Strict liability in the causation and damage are only two elements, namely, proof of causation by the plaintiff as long as the damage to these two factors and can get relief.
(E) of strict liability Juzheng
Strict liability is based on the absolute security breach of its obligations, regardless of whether the defendant to do the ty of care to the most cautious, as long as it should be responsible for the damage occurred, if the defendant can not be reasonable to defense (and defense is very limited), you can not remove responsibility, that is part of the plaintiff's burden of proof shifted to the defendant, the plaintiff only to prove causation and damage had been sufficient.
(F) defense of strict liability in the Restrictive
1, the third behavior, animal behavior and the forces of nature cause damage can not be the defenses.
2, the victim can not be the fault of defense.
3, the victims of people, things and animals, abnormal sensitivity can be used as defense.
4, the performance of public ties as defense.
Comment on the strict liability
(A) availability: American tort law is rooted in the philosophy of pragmatism in the soil, advocating people-centered, knowledge and human experience claims can not be separated, emphasizing the unity of theory and practice. On this basis, the case law system is the empirical wisdom of judges and logical reasoning with the proct. The strict liability from the case law through evolution, widening the scope of its application, this fact itself proves the rule dynamic and practical.
(B) Transcendence: whether scholars have the responsibility of strict liability is equivalent to what different opinions, but no doubt that it goes beyond the French law "presumption of fault liability" and the German law, "dangerous ty," and broke through to abstract known for speculative and logically coherent system of civil law tort theory of barriers to a unified system to a al responsibility principle or the principle of diversity attributable to system development, and thus the world had a profound influence legislation.
(C) justice: perpetrators and victims of strict liability emphasized to achieve a balance of interests, reflecting the protection of the weak instead of the new concept of equal protection, and to achieve substantial justice. This is in the field of proct liability and workers compensation in particular stands out.
要悬赏分呀！
『叁』 法律专业术语英文翻译
网络隐私权 Online Privacy Rights
网络实名制 real name registration
侵权主体main part of Infringement
侵权责任 Infringement Responsibility或 the Responsibility of Infringement
侵犯 infringe
人肉搜索 Internet mass hunting或Cyber Manhunt
历史分析法 historic analysis或history analysis
比较分析法method of comparative analysis
法解释学方法method of Law Hermeneutic
呵呵，费了很多功夫帮你查的，希望能帮到你~~
『肆』 请问一个法律术语的英语翻译。
直接翻译成Attribution Principle就可以了。
『伍』 救助英语高手解答法律英语翻译题。 行为人因过错侵害他人民事权益或利益的，应当承担侵权责任。
Acts who through their fault infringe upon the civil rights or interests, he shall assume the tort liability.
『陆』 急求法律英语的一段翻译，不要翻译工具的，非常非常感谢
第三部分从前两部分内容中提炼出本案的争议焦点，并在第四部分围绕其摘开讨论：视频网站版权侵权损害赔偿责任认定；“通知与移除”免责条款的适用；损害赔偿数额的认定方式。其中，第一个问题在理论界主流观点一直存在分歧，过错说及无过错说均不乏支持者。后两个问题则是对近年法院针对视频网站版权侵权审判方式加以探讨。“通知与移除”免责条款是借鉴美国法律的结果，而在对通知的作用与意义、作为被告的视频网站主观心态的认定的理解上却存在误区，以致各地法院在适用条件上标准不一。至于赔偿数额的计算方法，由于此类案件的复杂性和特殊性，法院在审判中常用的和创造性采用的方法均值得研究。
第五部分是研究结论，通过对上述三个争议焦点的分析论证，笔者提出了自己的观点，对于视频网站版权侵权问题，首先必须适用过错责任原则解决损害赔偿责任。其次，对于“通知与移除”免责条款这一舶来品，要结合法律本义及具体案情在认定网站主观过错的基础上决定是否适用，尤其要厘清通知的性质。而鉴于视频网站版权侵权屡禁不止，赔偿数额采用补偿式的计算方式已无法独立解决这一问题。最后，笔者针对上述问题对立法及审判方式提出了自己的一些建议。
Before the third part of contents of the two parts to extract the focus of controversy in this case and in the fourth part of open discussion around its pick: Video website right infringement liability for damage found; "notice and remove the" exemption clauses apply; amount of damages identification methods. One of the first questions at the theoretical circles have been the mainstream opinion differences, fault and no-fault Say Say there is no lack of supporters of both. After two questions, it is the courts in recent years web for video right infringement trial mode to be explored. "Notice and remove the" exemption clause in the United States are drawing on the results of the law, while in the notification of the role and significance, as the defendant's subjective video web mentality on the understanding that there are errors all over the court at which the conditions on the application of standards 1. As for the method of calculating the amount of compensation, such cases because of the complexity and particularity, the court at trial and creative use of commonly used methods are worth studying.
The fifth part is the conclusion of the study, through focus on the above analysis of three controversial argument, the author put forward their opinion, the web video right infringement problem, we must first resolve the application of the principle of fault liability damages. Secondly, for "notice and remove the" exemption clause in the imports, in conjunction with the legal merits of the original meaning and the specific website at that subjective fault on the basis of deciding whether to apply, in particular, want to clarify the nature of the notice. In view of the video website of repeated right infringement, the amount of compensation using the method for calculating the compensation has been unable to independently solve this problem. Finally, the author of legislation to address these issues and the trial by way of some of the recommendations of its own.
权能:Empowerment
『柒』 谁懂法律英语
涉及条款12.3和12.4，对于以许可期间首日后接连的一个月内提出的所有请求，许可证发放者在协定下或与协定相关的对许可证持有者的全部责任（如果存在的话），不论是合同、侵权（包括过失）或其他情形，都应以许可证持有者在那一个月期间内以许可费的方式交给许可证发放者的数额为限。
这应该是比较正式的翻译。
『捌』 法律英语高手请进
侵权责任liability for tort
契约责任contractual liability
民法civil law
合同关系congruence relation
第三方责任 The third party liability
委托人 client /consigner /constituent
『玖』 有几个法律英语句子请帮忙翻译一下
1. To establish an effective contract, the parties must be consensual, and the agreement is adopted by the party to put forward an offer that the other party to accept an offer to be embodied in
2. If the commitment to the force of law to become an exchange, it is necessary to carry out
3. Must have a valid contract for the parties to support the price.'s Definition of price is reached through bargaining and exchange. In other words, those who accept the commitment to give up something or suffer damage to the contract in exchange for promises
4. Revocable contracts can mean the cancellation of the contract, that is to say, even if the contract by the agreement constitutes a clear and there is value and purpose of the law, a party can legally withdraw
5. Contract can be considered as null and void a number of reasons, such as illegal, not price, or one or both parties do not ability. In some cases, out of public order and good customs of the reasons, the court will determine a legal contract null and void
6. Intentional tort some of the accused can show that the infringement is allowed to raise legal defense
7. Fraud as a violation of a defense
8. Tort law is what the violations, and that can be socially acceptable and responsible standards of conct
9. Contract is an agreement of both parties, a party that is in violation of the agreement constitute a breach of contract
10. Waiver of indivial freedom does not constitute unlawful detention
『拾』 什么是侵权 侵权责任
一、侵权行为是一种侵害他人权益的行为，因此侵权行为也可以称为一种侵害行为，这可以从词源学上得到一定程度的印证。在英语中，“侵权行为”一词称作“tort"，来源于拉丁文“tortus "，原意是指扭曲和弯曲，它也用于将某人的手臂或腿砍掉的情形，此种含义仍然能从德语（jemanden einen Tort antum；Tortur）和法语(avior tort;faire tortous)中找到，以后该词逐渐演化为错误(Wrong)的意思。在法语中，tortum和tort都是来源于拉丁语“delictum"，其原意是“过错”，“罪过”。拉丁语名词delictum派生于动词delinqere（偏离正确的道路），意思是一个违法、一个失误或者一个错误。中文的“侵权行为”一词“最早于清末编定《大清民律》草案时才开始应用。”但是在旧中国民法中对侵权行为的概念却缺乏明确的界定。
二、
行为分类
（1）按构成要件分
一般侵权行为：指行为人基于过错直接致人损害，因而适用民法上一般责任条款的行为。
特殊侵权行为：行为人虽无过错 但依民法特别责任条款或民事特别法应承担责任的行为 。
（2）按侵害对象分
侵害财产权行为：包括侵害物权及知识产权中的财产权行为。
侵害人身权行为：包括侵害他人身体和心理的行为。
（3）按致害人的人数分
单独侵权行为：致害人仅为一人的侵权行为。
共同侵权行为：致害人为二人以上的侵权行为 致害人应负连带的损害赔偿责任。
（4）按行为性质分
积极侵权行为：指致害人以积极作为的形式致人损害的行为。
消极侵权行为：指致害人以消极不作为的形式致人损害的行为。
三、
侵权责任是指民事主体因实施侵权行为而应承担的民事法律后果。侵权责任是任何人都对他人承担这样一种义务，即不因为自己的错误（过错）行为而侵害了他人的合法权益，否则即能构成侵权行为，要对受害方承担责任。侵权行为基本上都是违法行为。
法律特征
侵权责任的法律特征表现在：
1、侵权责任是民事主体因违反法律规定的义务而应承担的法律后果
规定
民事义务有法定义务和约定义务，法定义务是通过法律的强制性规范、禁止性规范设定的义务。这种义务对于每个自然人、法人具有普遍的适用性，违反此种义务，即构成侵权行为责任。而约定义务则是特定当事人之间设定的某种义务，违反约定义务，构成违约责任。
2、侵权责任以侵权行为为前提要件
侵权责任产生的基础是侵权行为，没有侵权行为则不存在承担侵权责任的问题。侵权责任正是行为人实施侵权行为应承担的法律后果。
3、侵权责任的形式具有多样性
侵权责任的行为人或责任人除了要承担赔偿损失、返还财产等财产责任外，在很多情况下，还可能同时承担停止侵害、恢复名誉、消除影响、赔礼道歉等非财产形式的责任。